Comments on: Crossing the streams – large numbers of Twitter updates http://solyoung.com/2008/06/29/crossing-the-streams-large-numbers-of-twitter-updates/ Out In His Elements Mon, 02 Jan 2012 03:59:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: philbaumann http://solyoung.com/2008/06/29/crossing-the-streams-large-numbers-of-twitter-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2863 philbaumann Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:46:17 +0000 http://solyoung.com/?p=212#comment-2863 (Shoot, I have to get my slide rule out.)<br><br>Aint Moore's law a bitch? See if you can get Scoble (email) or GG on this one. You might be onto something here. (Shoot, I have to get my slide rule out.)

Aint Moore's law a bitch? See if you can get Scoble (email) or GG on this one. You might be onto something here.

]]> By: Sol Young http://solyoung.com/2008/06/29/crossing-the-streams-large-numbers-of-twitter-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2862 Sol Young Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:42:07 +0000 http://solyoung.com/?p=212#comment-2862 Right... But Moore's law is X to the power of 2. My calcs point to one-to-many being X to the power of X (would love some feedback here).<br><br>If X is controlled by human population, maybe catching up is possible. But it would also be controlled by Twitter popularity, and it's just now touching the mainstream. Right… But Moore's law is X to the power of 2. My calcs point to one-to-many being X to the power of X (would love some feedback here).

If X is controlled by human population, maybe catching up is possible. But it would also be controlled by Twitter popularity, and it's just now touching the mainstream.

]]> By: philbaumann http://solyoung.com/2008/06/29/crossing-the-streams-large-numbers-of-twitter-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2861 philbaumann Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:30:00 +0000 http://solyoung.com/?p=212#comment-2861 You raise a great question with "...if this is a challenge beyond persent day computing". It might be, although if it is, the catch-up might be fairly quick.<br><br>Good point there. You raise a great question with “…if this is a challenge beyond persent day computing”. It might be, although if it is, the catch-up might be fairly quick.

Good point there.

]]> By: philbaumann http://solyoung.com/2008/06/29/crossing-the-streams-large-numbers-of-twitter-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2564 philbaumann Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:46:17 +0000 http://solyoung.com/?p=212#comment-2564 (Shoot, I have to get my slide rule out.)<br><br>Aint Moore's law a bitch? See if you can get Scoble (email) or GG on this one. You might be onto something here. (Shoot, I have to get my slide rule out.)

Aint Moore's law a bitch? See if you can get Scoble (email) or GG on this one. You might be onto something here.

]]> By: Sol Young http://solyoung.com/2008/06/29/crossing-the-streams-large-numbers-of-twitter-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2563 Sol Young Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:42:07 +0000 http://solyoung.com/?p=212#comment-2563 Right... But Moore's law is X to the power of 2. My calcs point to one-to-many being X to the power of X (would love some feedback here).<br><br>If X is controlled by human population, maybe catching up is possible. But it would also be controlled by Twitter popularity, and it's just now touching the mainstream. Right… But Moore's law is X to the power of 2. My calcs point to one-to-many being X to the power of X (would love some feedback here).

If X is controlled by human population, maybe catching up is possible. But it would also be controlled by Twitter popularity, and it's just now touching the mainstream.

]]> By: philbaumann http://solyoung.com/2008/06/29/crossing-the-streams-large-numbers-of-twitter-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2562 philbaumann Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:30:00 +0000 http://solyoung.com/?p=212#comment-2562 You raise a great question with "...if this is a challenge beyond persent day computing". It might be, although if it is, the catch-up might be fairly quick.<br><br>Good point there. You raise a great question with “…if this is a challenge beyond persent day computing”. It might be, although if it is, the catch-up might be fairly quick.

Good point there.

]]>